I have three tables, 1 parent with 2 parents 1-to-1 relationship with parents.
Table 1: People
I want a report that looks like this :
Person1:
First_Name ------- Last_name
Phone 1: ------ 12345 ---- Home - Phone 2: ----- - 54321 ---- Work
Mail 1: ------- first@mail.com .work
Mail 2: ------- first@mail.com .work
Mail 3: ---- ---first@mail.com .work
Person 2:
------- First_nem ------ - Last_name
Phone 1: ------ 12345 ---- Home - Phone 2: ------ 54321 ---- Work
mail1: ------- first @ Mail.com-- --work
Mail 2: ------- first @ mail.com @ w Ork
Mail 3: ------- first@mail.com.twork
I love using this reporting services.
EDIT: I know how to add all the tables with the left join, I have no idea how to get it done.
OK, this is a type of summary that you need to contact. I can not give you a step-by-step because it will be impossible long, but you should start it. (Also keep in mind that I am doing this with memory):
-
You will need three datasets, for each one, phone number and email address. I'm assuming that there is a similar type of ID field in the phone number and email address, a way to call people and tie on an email address You will need that field in your area.
You do not have to join your SQL: The report will be linked between three datasets.
-
Put a matrix on your report Is it attracted by people's datasets? Enter the first and last name in the matrix expansion row.
-
Under your first and last name, add a new extension line to your matrix.
-
Combine cells in your new extension row so that you have a very wide cell.
-
Embed (drag and drop) a new matrix in a single wide cell in its new extension row.
-
Link your matrix to the phone dataset. Set up a record filter in the matrix to limit those records that match the ID field in the parent matrix.
-
Set up the phone as much as you like in embedded hair matrix.
-
Repeat step 3-7 dataset with email address.
You do not really need to create a group (unless you want to include any sort of subtotal) because you really do not group anything Are: displaying a list with just the embedded sub-lists
Popular posts from this blog
I know that a XmlSerializer throws an exception if the type passed does not match the type Since then the serializer was created My question is: Is it possible to serial the base type without knowing the derivative type? Consider the following scenario: The following classes are in a top-level domain and there is no dependency : Public Class Serializer {Private Static String Serialize (base basedata) {var serializer = New XML serializer (typefile); Var sb = new stringbilder (); (Var author = XmlWriter.Create (sb)) using {serializer.Serialize (author, bassadata); } Return sb.ToString (); } Private static string Deserialize (...) {...}} Public class base {public string name {get; Set; }} The following derivative classes have additional dependencies on things like UI components, structure, etc. (and more on this later): [Export (Typ (IMyComponent)] Public category was created: Base, IMyComponent, INotifyPropertyChanged {public new string name {get {return base.Name; ...
I want to set unhandledExceptionMode.ThrowException for current AppDomain and not only for application threads. An exception from the second thread should also be handled by my current Donan_Unimated exception handler. Is it possible? Here's my code: Fixed class program {/// & lt; Summary & gt; Main entry point for the application /// & lt; / Summary & gt; [STAThread] static zero major () {applications Set unhandled exception mode (unwanted exception. Throws up); AppDomain.CurrentDomain.UnhandledException + = New UnrestrictedExceptionEndception (CurrentDomain_UnhandledException); Application.EnableVisualStyles (); Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault (wrong); Application.Run (New Form 1 ()); } Static Zero CurrentDomain_UnhandledException (Object Sender, UnhandledExceptionEventArgs E) {File.AppendAllText ("Log.txt", (Exception) e.ExceptionObject). Message + environment. Newline); }} Maybe you search for the behavior provided by Applic...
I encounter a problem when I develop a network card driver in Linux. As we all know that the MTU fragment refers to the maximum size of the IP packet. And the squad will be sent to the exclamation function, which will include 14bytes including DST MAC Adrer, SRC MACEdre and LNG. But it is very strange that when I use different values for MTU, the pair size is different, sometimes it is 10bytes, sometimes it is 14bytes, it is based on the size of the MTU For example, I use 7828 as the size of the UDP payload, when MTU is 7700, the size of the scab in the XMT function is 7714, while when MTU is 7800, the size of the scalable is 7810. Can anyone explain this? I think there are some aligned boundaries for the IP packet, but I did not find it. I searched the answers from the Internet, and I found that there is a line limit for the payload field. The frame payload field must be aligned to 8 bytes. So if MTU is 7700, then the correct size of the IP frame should be 7680 + 20 = 7700 ...
Comments
Post a Comment